profile-img
Eduncle posted an MCQ
October 20, 2019 • 15:35 pm 0 points
  • UGC NET
  • Law

Arrange the following decided cases on the right to health in a chronological order and choose the answer by using the code given below :

Arrange the following decided cases on the right to health in a chronological order and choose the answer by using the code given below : (a) Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samiti v. State of West Bengal (b) Paramananda Katara v. Union of India (c) Social Jurists v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (d) Sahara House v. Union of India Code :

Choose Your Answer:
0 Attempts Submit Now
  • 0 Likes
  • 1 Comments
  • 0 Shares
  • comment-profile-img>
    Eduncle Best Answer

    In Parmanand Katara v. Union of India Parmanand Katara v. Union of India, 1989 4 SCC 286 this Court observed that Article 21 casts the obligation on the State to preserve life which is the paramount duty of the State according to the Constitution.
    Paschim Banga khet Mazdoor Samity versus State of West Bengal 1996 SOL Case No. 169 (Supreme Court of India)
    Constitution of the Republic of India - Article 21 - Right to life - Patient denied emergency medical treatment - hospitals without facilities and or space to accommodate patient - whether right to life violated - State bound to preserve human life - seriously injured patients cannot be denied admission on ground of non-availability of beds - state under duty to improve its facilities in light of growing needs - State bound irrespective of financial constraints
    Social Jurist, A Lawyers Group vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors. on 22 March, 2007
    The constitutional mandate for assuring the dignity of individual is contained in the very preamble of the Constitution of India. To live with dignity would take within its ambit legitimate expectation of the citizens of the country for being provided with good environment and health care. 
    Subrata Roy Sahara vs Uoi & Ors on 6 May, 2014.
    In the present writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayers :
    (a) Declare the order dated 4.3.2014 as void, nullity and non-est in the eyes of law;
    (b) Declare that the incarceration and the custody of the petitioner are illegal which should be terminated forthwith;
    (c) Issue such other writ in the nature of Habeas (corpus) or other writs, order or direction for release of the petitioner from the illegal custody.
    (d) Pass such further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

whatsapp-btn

Do You Want Better RANK in Your Exam?

Start Your Preparations with Eduncle’s FREE Study Material

  • Updated Syllabus, Paper Pattern & Full Exam Details
  • Sample Theory of Most Important Topic
  • Model Test Paper with Detailed Solutions
  • Last 5 Years Question Papers & Answers